Traxcell Technologies, LLC v. Huawei Technologies USA Inc.

Filing 89

ORDER ADOPTING 60 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 10/11/2017. (sm, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION TRAXCELL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. § § § § § § Case No. 2:17-cv-00042-RWS-RSP (Lead) ORDER Magistrate Judge Payne issued a report recommending that the motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“Samsung”) (Docket No. 26 in Case No. 2:17-cv-00045) be denied. No objections were filed, and the time to do so has now passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Having considered the Report and Recommendation de novo, the Court finds no reason to reject or modify the recommended disposition. See Fed. R. Civ. P. . 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The Magistrate Judge appropriately recommended denying Samsung’s Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim, as the amended complaint satisfies the pleading standard. Docket No. 60 at 1. Accordingly, It is ORDERED: (1) The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Docket No. 60, is ADOPTED. (2) Samsung’s Motion to Dismiss, Docket No. 26 in Case No. 2:17-cv-00045, is DENIED. SIGNED this 11th day of October, 2017. ____________________________________ ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?