Gentry v. Hochheim Prairie Farm Mutual Insurance Association et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 50 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiffs complaint against all Defendants is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All relief not granted is DENIED. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 7/12/2017. (slo, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JERRY GENTRY, pro se;
HOCHHEIM PRAIRIE FARM MUTUAL
INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, et al.
Case No. 2:17-CV-00151-JRG-RSP
Before the Court are the Plaintiff’s objections to Magistrate Judge Payne’s
recommendation that Plaintiff’s complaint against all Defendants be dismissed with prejudice for
failure to state a claim. For dispositive matters referred to a magistrate judge, the district court
must “determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly
objected to.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). “The district judge may accept,
reject, or modify the recommend disposition.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).
Upon de novo review of the properly objected to portions of Judge Payne’s findings,
conclusions, and recommendation, the Court adopts the recommended disposition without
modification. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint against all Defendants be
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All relief not granted is hereby DENIED. A separate Final
Order will follow. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a).
SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 12th day of July, 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?