Bledsoe v. Harrison Co. Jail Medical et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 66 Report and Recommendations. ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction, (Dkt. #18), is DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 3/13/2018. (ch, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JAMIE LEE BLEDSOE, #2150627
HARRISON CO. JAIL MEDICAL, et al.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17cv488
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff Jamie Lee Bledsoe (Bledsoe), an inmate formerly confined at the Harrison County
Jail proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging
purported violations of his constitutional rights. The complaint was referred for findings of fact,
conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case. This order concerns only
Bledsoe’s motion for a temporary order or preliminary injunction, (Dkt. #18), and the Magistrate
Judge’s Report, (Dkt. #66).
After reviewing Bledsoe’s motion, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report, (Dkt. #66),
recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction be denied as moot. A copy of
the Report was sent to Bledsoe at his address, return service requested. The docket shows that
Bledsoe received the Report on February 13, 2018. (Dkt. #67). However, no objections have been
received to date.
Accordingly, Bledsoe is barred from de novo review by the District Judge of those findings,
conclusions, and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review
of the unobjected-to proposed factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the
district court. Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir.
1996) (en banc).
The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this cause and the Report of the Magistrate Judge.
Upon such review, the Court has determined that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. See
United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918, 109 S.Ct. 3243
(1989) (where no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the standard of review is
“clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law.”). Accordingly it is
ORDERED that the Report of the Magistrate Judge, (Dkt. #66), is ADOPTED. Further,
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, (Dkt. #18), is DENIED
SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 13th day of March, 2018.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?