Takhvar v. Page et al

Filing 30

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 27 Report and Recommendations Mr. Takhvars objections, Dkt. No. 29, are OVERRULED. Defendants motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 17, is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 3/6/2018. (ch, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
CHRISTOPHER TAKHVAR, pro se

v.
LARRY PAGE et al.

§
§
§
§
§

Case No. 2:17-cv-00673-JRG-RSP

ORDER
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Payne,
recommending that Mr. Takhvar’s claims against all defendants be dismissed with prejudice. See
Dkt. No. 27. For dispositive matters referred to a magistrate judge, the district court must
“determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected
to.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). “The district judge may accept, reject, or
modify the recommend disposition.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Upon de
novo review of the objected to portions of the Magistrate Judge’s findings, conclusions, and
.
recommendation, the Court finds no reason to reject or modify the recommended disposition.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:
(1) Mr. Takhvar’s objections, Dkt. No. 29, are OVERRULED.
(2) The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 27, is ADOPTED.
(3) Defendants’ motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 17, is GRANTED. A separate Final
Judgement will follow. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a).
SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 6th day of March, 2018.

____________________________________
RODNEY GILSTRAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE