Takhvar v. Page et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 27 Report and Recommendations Mr. Takhvars objections, Dkt. No. 29, are OVERRULED. Defendants motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 17, is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 3/6/2018. (ch, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CHRISTOPHER TAKHVAR, pro se
LARRY PAGE et al.
Case No. 2:17-cv-00673-JRG-RSP
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Payne,
recommending that Mr. Takhvar’s claims against all defendants be dismissed with prejudice. See
Dkt. No. 27. For dispositive matters referred to a magistrate judge, the district court must
“determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected
to.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). “The district judge may accept, reject, or
modify the recommend disposition.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Upon de
novo review of the objected to portions of the Magistrate Judge’s findings, conclusions, and
recommendation, the Court finds no reason to reject or modify the recommended disposition.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:
(1) Mr. Takhvar’s objections, Dkt. No. 29, are OVERRULED.
(2) The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 27, is ADOPTED.
(3) Defendants’ motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 17, is GRANTED. A separate Final
Judgement will follow. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a).
SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 6th day of March, 2018.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?