Specialized Monitoring Solutions, LLC v. ADT LLC d/b/a ADT Security Services

Filing 73

FINAL JUDGMENT Signed by Judge William C. Bryson on 02/07/2019. (klc, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
SPECIALIZED MONITORING
SOLUTIONS, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
ADT LLC d/b/a ADT SECURITY
SERVICES,

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Case No. 2:17-CV-768-WCB-RSP

Defendant.
FINAL JUDGMENT
In an order filed today, the Court has granted summary judgment in favor of defendant
ADT LLC d/b/a ADT Security Services summary judgment and against plaintiff Specialized
Monitoring Solutions LLC on the ground that the asserted claims of United States Patent No.
6,657,533 are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Pursuant to Rule 58, Fed. R. Civ. P., the Court
hereby ORDERS AND ENTERS JUDGMENT as follows:
1. Claims 1–5, 7–9, 17–23, 25–27, and 35–36 of United States Patent No. 6,657,533 are
invalid.
2. Plaintiff Specialized Monitoring Solutions LLC takes nothing from defendant ADT
LLC d/b/a ADT Security Services.
3. Pursuant to Rule 54(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. § 1920,
the Court finds that defendant ADT LLC d/b/a ADT Security Services is the prevailing party in
this matter and that costs are taxed in favor of the defendant ADT LLC d/b/a ADT Security
Services.

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 7th day of February, 2019.

____________________________
WILLIAM C. BRYSON
UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE

2