Smith v. Director TDCJ-CID
Filing
2
MEMORANDUM ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER that this petition should be transferred to the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven on 3/14/2018. (slo, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
LAWRENCE SMITH
§
VS.
§
DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:18cv37
MEMORANDUM ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER
Petitioner Lawrence Smith, an inmate confined at the Telford Unit of the Texas Department
of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this petition for writ
of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
Discussion
On June 18, 2009, in the 71st Judicial District Court for Harrison County, Texas, petitioner
was convicted of murder. Petitioner was sentenced to a term of sixty years’ confinement in the
Texas Department of Criminal Justice.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d), a petitioner may bring his petition for writ of habeas corpus
in the district court for the district wherein such person is in custody or in the district court for the
district within which he was convicted. Section 2241(d) further provides that the district court in
the exercise of its discretion may transfer the action to the other district in the furtherance of justice.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 124, Harrison County is located in the Marshall Division of the
Eastern District of Texas. Jurisdiction is proper in the Eastern District of Texas because the prisoner
was originally convicted within the district court’s territorial boundaries and is currently confined
in this district. However, the petition was inadvertently filed in the Texarkana Division instead of
the division in which petitioner was convicted, the Marshall Division. The Court has considered the
circumstances and has determined that the interest of justice would best be served if this petition
were transferred to the division in which the petitioner was convicted.
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), for the convenience of parties and witnesses and in the interest
of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it could
.
have been brought. Such a transfer may be done sua sponte and is reviewable only for an abuse of
discretion. Mills v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 886 F.2d 758, 761 (5th Cir. 1989).
Since petitioner complains of a conviction which occurred in Harrison County, all records
involving this action most likely will be located in the Marshall Division. Thus, the transfer of this
action to such division would further justice. Therefore, it is the opinion of the undersigned that this
petition should be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas,
Marshall Division. An Order of Transfer so providing shall be entered in accordance with this
Memorandum Opinion.
SIGNED this 14th day of March, 2018.
____________________________________
CAROLINE M. CRAVEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?