Texas Pellets, Inc. et al v. German Pellets GmbH et al

Filing 124

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 113 Report and Recommendations, 79 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Anne Leibold, Michael Leibold, Peter Leibold, 78 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Anne Leibold, Michael Leibold. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 9/29/2020. (nkl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION LIQUIDATING TRUST OF TEXAS PELLETS, INC. AND GERMAN PELLETS TEXAS, LLC, § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § Plaintiff, OFFICIAL UNSECURED CREDITORS COMMITTEE OF TEXAS PELLETS, INC. AND GERMAN PELLETS, LLC, Intervenor, v. IPBG PELLETS BETEILIGUNGS GMBH, PETER LEIBOLD, ANNE LEIBOLD, and MICHAEL LEIBOLD, Defendant. Case No. 2:18-cv-00178-JRG-RSP ORDER Defendants Anne Kathrin Leibold and Michael Leibold filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Dkt. No. 78) and a Motion to Dismiss on Grounds of Forum Non Conveniens (Dkt. No. 79.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 113), denying Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss. Defendants have now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 122) to the Report and Recommendation. After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motions to Dismiss, the Report and Recommendation, and the briefing on Defendants’ Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. 1/2 Accordingly, the Court OVERRULES Defendant’s Objections, ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, and DENIES the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Dkt. No. 78) and the Motion to Dismiss on Grounds of Forum Non Conveniens (Dkt. No. 79.) So ORDERED and SIGNED this 29th day of September, 2020. ____________________________________ RODNEY GILSTRAP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2/2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?