McKinnon v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. et al

Filing 102

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 90 Report and Recommendations, 97 Supplemental Report and Recommendations,. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 8/1/2022. (nkl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION BRANDY R. MCKINNON, Plaintiff, v. HOBBY LOBBY STORES, INC. AND KIM GREENLEE Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § Case No. 2:18-CV-00179-JRG-RSP ORDER Previously, Plaintiff Brandy McKinnon moved to nullify an arbitration award issued in favor of defendants Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (“HLS”) and Kim Greenlee. Dkt. No. 81. In addition, HLS and Greenlee moved to confirm the same. Dkt. No. 87. Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation. Dkt. No. 90. The parties filed objections thereto. Dkt. Nos. 94, 96. After a review of the objections, Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Supplemental Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 97, recommending (1) the denial of McKinnon’s motion to nullify arbitration and (2) the grant of HLS’s motion to confirm arbitration and dismiss with prejudice McKinnon’s claims against HLS and Greenlee. McKinnon filed a further objection, Dkt. No. 99. After conducting a de novo review of the relevant filings, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 90, as supplemented, Dkt. No. 97, and concludes that the McKinnon’s Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 90, as supplemented, Dkt. No. 97, was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES McKinnon’s Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 90, as supplemented, Dkt. No. 97, and orders that McKinnon’s motion to nullify arbitration, Dkt. No. 81, is DENIED and that HLS’s and Greenlee’s motion to confirm arbitration, Dkt. No. 87, is GRANTED to confirm arbitration and DISMISS-WITHPREJUDICE McKinnon’s claims against HLS and Greenlee. So Ordered this Aug 1, 2022

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?