United Services Automobile Association v. PNC Bank N.A.

Filing 677

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 636 Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 5/9/2022. (nkl, )

Download PDF
Case 2:20-cv-00319-JRG-RSP Document 677 Filed 05/09/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 37661 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, v. Plaintiff, PNC BANK N.A., Defendant. § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 2:20-CV-00319-JRG-RSP ORDER Plaintiff United Services Automobile Association (“USAA”) previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissing PNC's Patent-Eligibility Defenses (“USAA’s Motion for Summary Judgment”) (Dkt. No. 323) and Defendant PNC Bank N.A. (“PNC”) filed a Motion For Summary Judgment Of Lack Of Patent Eligibility Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (“PNC’s Motion for Summary Judgment”) (Dkt. No. 322.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendations and Order (Dkt. No. 636), recommending granting USAA’s Motion for Summary Judgment and denying PNC’s Motion for Summary Judgment. As to the Order, Magistrate Judge Payne entered an Order granting in part the Motion to Strike Portions of the Opening Expert Report of Mark Webster (“Motion to Strike”) (Dkt. No. 310) filed by USAA. PNC has filed objections to the Report and Recommendations and Order (Dkt. Nos. 656, 657). After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on all three motions, the Report and Recommendations and Order, and the briefing on PNC’s Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendations and Order and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendations and Order were erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES and PNC’s Objections (Dkt. Nos. 656, 657) and Case 2:20-cv-00319-JRG-RSP Document 677 Filed 05/09/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 37662 ADOPTS the Report and Recommendations and Order (Dkt. No. 636) and orders that USAA’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; PNC’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; and the Motion to Strike is GRANTED IN PART. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 9th day of May, 2022. ____________________________________ RODNEY GILSTRAP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?