Whirlpool Corporation et al v. Shenzhen Sanlida Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. et al
Filing
106
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 103 Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 3/26/2024. (CH)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
SHENZHEN SANLIDA ELETRICAL
TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. et al.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-cv-00027-JRG-RSP
ORDER
Plaintiffs Whirlpool Corporation and Whirlpool Properties, Inc. previously filed a
.
to Dismiss Defendants’ Counterclaims (Dkt. No. 96). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a
Motion
Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 103), recommending a grant in part of Whirlpool’s
Motion to Dismiss. Because no objections have been filed and for the reasons set forth in the
Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation
is
ADOPTED.
It
is
therefore
ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss Defendants’ Counterclaims (Dkt. No. 96) is
GRANTED IN PART dismissing Count III of the Defendants' Counterclaims.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 26th day of March, 2024.
____________________________________
RODNEY GILSTRAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?