ETX Minerals, LLC v. Plankton 360, LLC et al
Filing
15
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case as no parties or claims remain. (Motion(s) 10 , 14 terminated). Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 03/04/2025. (KLC)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
ETX MINERALS, LLC
Plaintiff,
v.
PLANKTON 360, LLC and JOHN R.
BOWS,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CASE NO. 2:24-CV-0489-JRG-RSP
ORDER
Plaintiff ETX Minerals previously filed an Amended Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice
(Dkt. No. 10.) Defendant Plankton 360, LLC filed a response stating that it does not oppose the
Motion. (Dkt. No. 13 at 1.) The pro se Defendant, John R. Bows was served with the Motion. (Dkt.
No. 10 at 3; Dkt. No. 12.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation
recommending grant of ETX Minerals’ Motion to Dismiss. (Dkt. No. 14.) Because no objections
have been filed and because of the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the
Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No.
11) is GRANTED.
Accordingly, all claims and causes of action asserted between Plaintiff ETX Minerals and
Defendants Plankton 360, LLC and John R. Bows in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All pending requests for relief in the above-captioned case not
explicitly granted herein are DENIED AS MOOT.
The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case as no parties or claims
remain.
So Ordered this
Mar 4, 2025
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?