ETX Minerals, LLC v. Plankton 360, LLC et al

Filing 15

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case as no parties or claims remain. (Motion(s) 10 , 14 terminated). Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 03/04/2025. (KLC)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ETX MINERALS, LLC Plaintiff, v. PLANKTON 360, LLC and JOHN R. BOWS, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 2:24-CV-0489-JRG-RSP ORDER Plaintiff ETX Minerals previously filed an Amended Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice (Dkt. No. 10.) Defendant Plankton 360, LLC filed a response stating that it does not oppose the Motion. (Dkt. No. 13 at 1.) The pro se Defendant, John R. Bows was served with the Motion. (Dkt. No. 10 at 3; Dkt. No. 12.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation recommending grant of ETX Minerals’ Motion to Dismiss. (Dkt. No. 14.) Because no objections have been filed and because of the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 11) is GRANTED. Accordingly, all claims and causes of action asserted between Plaintiff ETX Minerals and Defendants Plankton 360, LLC and John R. Bows in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All pending requests for relief in the above-captioned case not explicitly granted herein are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case as no parties or claims remain. So Ordered this Mar 4, 2025 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?