Morgan et al v. Plano Independent School District et al

Filing 354

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 331 Motion to Dismiss filed by Lynn Swanson. The claims against Defendant Swanson are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Defendant shall recover her costs from Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 2/13/2013. (baf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION JONATHAN MORGAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE PLANO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § Case No. 4:04cv447 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On September 25, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Swanson’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ “Other Claims” Based on Qualified Immunity (Dkt. 331) be GRANTED. The court has made a de novo review of the objections raised by Plaintiffs (see Dkt. 350) and Defendant Swanson’s response (see Dkt. 352) and is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the objections are without merit as to the ultimate findings of the Magistrate Judge. The court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this court. Therefore, Defendant Swanson’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ “Other Claims” Based on Qualified Immunity (Dkt. 331) is GRANTED. The claims against Defendant Swanson are DISMISSED with prejudice, and Defendant shall recover her costs from Plaintiffs. IT IS SO ORDERED. . SIGNED this the 13th day of February, 2013. _______________________________ RICHARD A. SCHELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?