McNeeley v. Experian Information Solutions Inc et al
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE - RE 24 Report and Recommendations, GRANTING 15 Motion for Leave to File Answer Out of Time filed by American Express Company, DENYING 13 Motion for Default Judgment filed by Clark McNeeley. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 9/29/2008. (baf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION CLARK A. MCNEELEY, § § Plaintiff, § § and § § EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, § INC., and AMERICAN EXPRESS § COMPANY § § Defendants. §
CASE NO. 4:08CV81
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On September 10, 2008, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. 13) should be DENIED and Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Answer Out of Time (Dkt. 15) should be GRANTED. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Therefore, Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. 13) is DENIED, and Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Answer Out of Time (Dkt. 15) is GRANTED. The answer
filed on August 14, 2008 shall be deemed as properly before this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 29th day of September, 2008.
____________________________________ MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?