Sarr v. Director, TDCJ-CID

Filing 21

ORDER OF DISMISSAL ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 18 Report and Recommendation. The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains his proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of s uch action, has been presented for consideration, and having made a de novo review of the objections raised by the Petitioner to the Report, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the obj ections of the Petitioner are without merit. Therefore the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and the case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. All motions by either party not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 8/11/2011. (kls, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
OUSMANE SARR, #1288041

§

VS.

§

DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:08cv332

ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the above-styled and
numbered petition for a writ of habeas corpus should be denied. The Petitioner has filed objections.
The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains his proposed findings of fact and
recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration, and having

.

made a de novo review of the objections raised by the Petitioner to the Report, the Court is of the
opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the objections of the
Petitioner are without merit. Therefore the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly
ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and the case is
DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. All motions by either party
not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED.

SIGNED this 11th day of August, 2011.

____________________________________
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE