Payne et al v. Apple Inc. et al

Filing 13

NOTICE by Apple Inc. Notice of Second Supplemental Filing Relating to Motion to Transfer Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Rushing, Don)

Download PDF
Payne et al v. Apple Inc. et al Doc. 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION ALYCE R. PAYNE, WILLIAM FRENCH, KAREN MICHAELS, and LORNA HARRIS, on Behalf of Themselves and all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. APPLE INC. and AT&T MOBILITY LLC, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-cv-00042 NOTICE OF SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL FILING RELATING TO MOTION TO TRANSFER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1407 TO THE CLERK OF THIS COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on March 11, 2009, in connection with the motion for transfer and consolidation of this and eleven similar actions that Apple filed with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the "JPML") on March 5, 2009 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, Apple submitted the following documents to the JPML: SECOND REVISED SCHEDULE OF PENDING ACTIONS; and PROOF OF SERVICE. Copies of the documents are attached hereto as Exhibits A and B. Defendant Apple Inc. files this Notice pursuant to Rule 5.12(c) of the Rules of the Judicial Panel for the purpose of informing the Court of the pendency of the proceedings before the MDL Panel and will keep the Court informed of further developments. sf-2654953 Dockets.Justia.com Dated: March 11, 2009 DON G. RUSHING MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/ Don G. Rushing Don G. Rushing Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. sf-2654953 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this motion was served on all counsel who have consented to electronic service on the 11th day of March 2009. Local Rule CV-5. By: / s/ Don G. Rushing Don G. Rushing sf-2654953

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?