Sander v. CitiMortgage Inc et al
Filing
49
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 40 Report and Recommendations, therefore Citimortgage, Inc. and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and Plaintiff shall take nothing by her claim. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 05/10/2011. (lhj, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
REBECCA SANDER,
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Plaintiff,
vs.
CITIMORTGAGE, INC., and
FEDERAL HOME LOAN
MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Defendants.
Civil Action No. 4:09cv566
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this
matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636. On March 24, 2011, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants Citimortgage, Inc. and Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 23) should be GRANTED and that
Plaintiff should take nothing by her claims here.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions
1
Case 4:09-cv-00566-RAS -DDB Document 47
of the court.
Filed 05/10/11 Page 2 of 2
Therefore, Defendants Citimortgage, Inc. and Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 23) is GRANTED and Plaintiff shall take
nothing by her claims here.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
.
SIGNED this the 10th day of May, 2011.
_______________________________
RICHARD A. SCHELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?