Winegarner v. Cinemark Holdings, Inc. et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 2/29/2012. (pad, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERM AN DIVISION
PETER DAVID WINEGARNER
CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC., ET AL.
CASE NO. 4:09CV627
Judge Schneider/Judge Mazzant
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this
matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636. On January 31, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Cinemark Holdings, Inc., “Cinemark Lewisville, TX,”
Sarah Van Zandt, and Roy Williams’s Motion to Enforce Court’s Order (Dkt. #114) be granted.
The Court, having made a de novo review of Plaintiff’s construed objections (Dkt. #123), is
of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the
objections are without merit. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Cinemark Holdings, Inc., "Cinemark Lewisville, TX," Sarah
Van Zandt, and Roy Williams's Motion to Enforce Court's Order (Dkt. #114) is GRANTED and
Plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
It is SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 29th day of February, 2012.
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?