Delmast v. Cardenas et al

Filing 182

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting 152 Motion for Summary Judgment. ORDERED that Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous. ORDERED that, in light of the fact that all other Defendants have previously beendismissed, this case be CLOSED. ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled upon are hereby DENIED. It is finally ORDERED that each party is to bear his own costs. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 6/29/2011. (pad, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION SAMUEL DEWAYNE DELMAST, #1589085 § VS. § ALFONSO CARDENAS, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:09cv629 § ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Don D. Bush. The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and adopts same as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (docket entry #152) is GRANTED and final judgment rendered in Defendants’ favor and against Plaintiff and that Plaintiff shall take nothing as a result of this action. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). It is further ORDERED that, in light of the fact that all other Defendants have previously been dismissed, this case be CLOSED. It is further 1 ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled upon are hereby DENIED. It is finally ORDERED that each party is to bear his own costs. . SIGNED this the 29th day of September, 2011. _______________________________ RICHARD A. SCHELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?