Prater v. Director, TDCJ-CID

Filing 19

ORDER OF DISMISSAL ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 16 Report and Recommendation. ORDERED that the petitions for a writ of habeas corpus are DENIED and these cases are DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 3/26/2013. (kls, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION TOMMY LOYD PRATER, JR., #1462451 § § VS. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:09cv632 Consolidated with 4:09cv633, 4:09cv634, 4:09cv635, 4:09cv636, 4:09cv637, 4:09cv638, and 4:09cv639 § ORDER OF DISMISSAL The above-entitled and numbered civil actions were referred to United States Magistrate Judge Don D. Bush, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the petitions for a writ of habeas corpus should be dismissed with prejudice. Petitioner filed objections. The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains his proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such actions, has been presented for consideration. Having made a de novo review of the objections raised by Petitioner to the Report, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly ORDERED that the petitions for a writ of habeas corpus are DENIED and these cases are DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED. . SIGNED this the 26th day of March, 2013. _______________________________ RICHARD A. SCHELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?