Payton v. Nantucket Landing et al

Filing 58

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 53 Report and Recommendation. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #43) is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 9/22/2011. (kls, )

Download PDF
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERM AN DIVISION GAYL PAYTON vs. NANTUCKET PARTNERS, L.P., and RICHMARK PROPERTIES, INC. § § § § § § Case No. 4:10-cv-00143 (Judge Schneider/Judge Mazzant) MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On August 19, 2011, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #43) should be granted. The Court, having made a de novo review of Plaintiff’s construed objections (Dkt. #57), is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the . objections are without merit. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #43) is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 22nd day of September, 2011. ____________________________________ MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?