Methvin v. USA
ORDER OF DISMISSAL ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 4 Report and Recommendation. ORDERED that the motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence is DENIED and Movant's case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. It is also ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 8/19/2011. (kls, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TANYA RENEE METHVIN, #14004-078
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CIVIL ACTION NO.4:10cv268
CRIM NO. 4:06cr169(5)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the motion to vacate,
set aside, or correct sentence should be denied and dismissed with prejudice. Movant has filed
The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains his proposed findings of fact and
recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration. Having
made a careful de novo review of the objections raised by Movant to the Report, the pleadings and
motions, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are
correct and the objections of Movant are without merit. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the
findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is
ORDERED that the motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence is DENIED and
Movant’s case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. It is also
ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED.
SIGNED this 19th day of August, 2011.
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?