Methvin v. USA

Filing 9

ORDER OF DISMISSAL ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 4 Report and Recommendation. ORDERED that the motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence is DENIED and Movant's case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. It is also ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 8/19/2011. (kls, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION TANYA RENEE METHVIN, #14004-078 § VS. § UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § CIVIL ACTION NO.4:10cv268 CRIM NO. 4:06cr169(5) ORDER OF DISMISSAL The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Amos L. Mazzant, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence should be denied and dismissed with prejudice. Movant has filed objections. The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains his proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration. Having made a careful de novo review of the objections raised by Movant to the Report, the pleadings and motions, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are . correct and the objections of Movant are without merit. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly ORDERED that the motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence is DENIED and Movant’s case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. It is also ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED. SIGNED this 19th day of August, 2011. ____________________________________ MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?