Fidelis Diagnostics, Inc. v. SafeGuard Services, L.L.C. et al

Filing 80

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 79 Report and Recommendations,, 76 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Fidelis Diagnostics, Inc. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment on PlaintiffsClaim Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) [Doc. #64] is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #76] isDENIED. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 7/25/12. (cm, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
FIDELIS DIAGNOSTICS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
SAFEGUARD SERVICES, LLC, et al.
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Case No. 4:10cv638
(Judge Clark/Judge Mazzant)

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this
matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636. On June 28, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff’s
Claim Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) [Doc. #64] be granted, and Plaintiff’s Motion
for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #76] be denied.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions
of the court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff’s
Claim Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) [Doc. #64] is GRANTED.

1

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #76] is
DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 25 day of July, 2012.

___________________________________
Ron Clark, United States District Judge

2