Kudu Co., Ltd. et al v. Latimer et al

Filing 24

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 17 Report and Recommendations, 8 Motion to Dismiss filed by Michael Francis Latimer. The Special Appearance of Respondent Michael Francis Latimer and, Subject Thereto, Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(5) (Dkt. #8) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 3/16/11. (cm, )

Download PDF
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERM AN DIVISION KUDU CO., LTD., KUDU REALTY CO., LTD., MARK REINECKE, and MR ASSETS CORPORATION CO., LTD. V. MICHAEL FRANCIS LATIMER and HORIZON SIAM CO., L.T.D. CASE NO. 4:10CV680 Judge Schneider/Judge Mazzant MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On February 22, 2011, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that the Special Appearance of Respondent Michael Francis Latimer and, Subject Thereto, Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(5) (Dkt. #8) should be DENIED. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the . Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Special Appearance of Respondent Michael Francis Latimer and, Subject Thereto, Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(5) (Dkt. #8) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 16th day of March, 2011. ____________________________________ MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?