Cooper, et al v. City of Plano et al

Filing 140

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, denying 62 Motion for Default Judgment filed by Teresa Ward Cooper, Jay S. Cooper, denying 59 REQUEST for Clerk's entry of Default Judgment as to unknown cl erks of the Collin County Clerk's Office; Unknown civilian employees, City of Plano, TX; and unknown police officers, City of Plano Police Department by Jay S. Cooper, Teresa Ward Cooper, denying 57 Motion for Default Judgment filed by Jay S. Cooper. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 7/12/2011. (kls, )

Download PDF
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERM AN DIVISION JAY S. COOPER V. CITY OF PLANO, ET AL. § § § § § § CASE NO. 4:10-CV-689 Judge Schneider/Judge Mazzant MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On June 17, 2011, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendants City of Plano, Muehlenbeck, Israelson, Glasscock, Neumeyer, Rushin, Gabriel, Angle, Perez, Perot, Oldham, Kaletta, Deleon, Claggett, Day, Murray, McNulty, Beougher, and an Unknown Clerk of the Collin County Clerk’s Office (Dkt. #57), Plaintiff’s Request for Default Judgment Against Defendants Unknown Clerks of the Collin County Clerk’s Office, Unknown Civilian Employees, City of Plano, Texas; and Unknown Police Officers, City of Plano Police Department (Dkt. #59) and Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendants Unknown Clerks of the Collin County Clerk’s Office; Unknown Civilian Employees, City of Plano, Texas; and Unknown Police Officers, City of Plano Police Department (Dkt. #62) should be denied. The Court, having made a de novo review of the objections raised by Plaintiff, is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the objections are without merit. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendants City of Plano, Muehlenbeck, Israelson, Glasscock, Neumeyer, Rushin, Gabriel, Angle, Perez, Perot, Oldham, Kaletta, Deleon, Claggett, Day, Murray, McNulty, Beougher, and an Unknown Clerk of the Collin County Clerk’s Office (Dkt. #57), Plaintiff’s Request for Default Judgment Against Defendants Unknown Clerks of the Collin County Clerk’s Office, Unknown Civilian Employees, . City of Plano, Texas; and Unknown Police Officers, City of Plano Police Department (Dkt. #59) and Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendants Unknown Clerks of the Collin County Clerk’s Office; Unknown Civilian Employees, City of Plano, Texas; and Unknown Police Officers, City of Plano Police Department (Dkt. #62) are DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 12th day of July, 2011. ____________________________________ MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?