Mungia v. Bell et al

Filing 9

ORDER OF DISMISSAL ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 7 Report and Recommendation. ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(g). It is further ORDERED that any and all motions not yet addressed are hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 8/31/2013. (kls, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION RAMON MUNGIA § VS. § FNU BELL, ET AL. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:10cv710 ORDER OF DISMISSAL The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Don D. Bush. The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration and the magistrate judge recommends that this case be dismissed pursuant to the “three strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff has filed objections, but the objections do not address the basis of the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. Instead, it essentially restates Plaintiff’s original complaint. See docket entry #8. Having made a de novo review of the objections raised by Plaintiff to the Report, the court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and Plaintiff’s objections are without merit. Accordingly, the court adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the court. It is therefore 1 ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). It is further ORDERED that any and all motions not yet addressed are hereby DENIED. . SIGNED this the 31st day of August, 2013. _______________________________ RICHARD A. SCHELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?