Perritt et al v. The Cupcakery, et al
Filing
106
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 98 Report and Recommendations, DENYING 24 Motion to Change Venue filed by The Cupcakery, Pamela F. Jenkins. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 8/10/2011. (baf, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERM AN DIVISION
RICKY B. PERRITT, Individually;
THE CUPCAKERY, LLC, a Texas Limited
Liability Company; BUSTER BAKING, LLC,
a Texas Limited Liability Company; and THE
WOODLANDS BAKING, LLC, a Texas
Limited Liability Company,
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
v.
§
§
PAMELA F. JENKINS, Individually; and
§
THE CUPCAKERY, LLC, a Nevada Limited §
Liability Company.
§
Case No. 4:11-CV-23
Judge Schneider/Judge Mazzant
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this
matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636. On July 18, 2011, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants Pamela F. Jenkins and The Cupcakery, LLC,
a Nevada Limited Liability Company’s Motion to Transfer Venue to the District of Nevada, Las
Vegas Division (Dkt. #24) should be denied.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions
of the Court.
.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendants Pamela F. Jenkins and The Cupcakery, LLC,
a Nevada Limited Liability Company’s Motion to Transfer Venue to the District of Nevada, Las
Vegas Division (Dkt. #24) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 10th day of August, 2011.
____________________________________
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?