L.G. Motorsports, Inc. v. NGMCO, Inc. et al
Filing
139
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE - GRANTING 118 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Michelin North America, Inc., 135 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 3/26/2014. (baf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
L.G. MOTORSPORTS, INC.
Plaintiff,
VS.
NGMCO, INC.,
CORVETTE RACING, INC.,
MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
and DOUG FEHAN
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CASE NO. 4:11CV112
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this
matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636. On March 4, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Michelin North America, Inc.’s Motion for
Summary Judgment Against Plaintiff (Dkt. 118) be GRANTED in its entirety, that Plaintiff take
nothing by its remaining claim here, and that the case be closed on the court’s docket.
The court has made a de novo review of Plaintiff’s objections, as well as Defendant’s
response, and is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct
and the objections are without merit as to the ultimate findings of the Magistrate Judge. The court
hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions
of this court.
1
Therefore, Defendant Michelin North America, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment
Against Plaintiff (Dkt. 118) is GRANTED in its entirety and Plaintiff shall take nothing by its
remaining claim here.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
.
SIGNED this the 26th day of March, 2014.
_______________________________
RICHARD A. SCHELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?