L.G. Motorsports, Inc. v. NGMCO, Inc. et al
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 7 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction. The claims against Defendant Fehan are hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 3/30/2012. (pad, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
L.G. MOTORSPORTS, INC.
CORVETTE RACING, INC.,
MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC., §
and DOUG FEHAN
CASE NO. 4:11CV112
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this
matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636. On March 6, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Doug Fehan’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of
Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue and Without Waiving and Subject Thereto, Motion to
Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Dkt. 7) be GRANTED in part and that the claims against
Defendant Fehan be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions
of the court.
Therefore, Defendant Doug Fehan’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and
Improper Venue and Without Waiving and Subject Thereto, Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State
a Claim (Dkt. 7) is GRANTED in part and the claims against Defendant Fehan are hereby dismissed
for lack of jurisdiction.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this the 30th day of March, 2012.
RICHARD A. SCHELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?