Fountainhead Management Inc v. Roberts

Filing 33

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 25 Report and Recommendations, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the case is REMANDED to the Justice of the Peace Court, Precinct 1, Cooke County, TX. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 07/12/2011. (lhj, )

Download PDF
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERM AN DIVISION FOUNTAINHEAD MANAGEMENT, INC. V. SEAN ROBERTS § § § § § § § CASE NO. 4:11CV172 Judge Schneider/Judge Mazzant MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On June 10, 2011, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations with regard to Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b) for Lack of Jurisdiction, or Failure to State a Claim and to Remand Case to State Court (Dkt. #13), recommending that the motion to remand should be granted. The Court, having made a de novo review of Plaintiff Fountainhead Management’s Limited Objection to the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #27), Defendant Sean Roberts’ Response to Plaintiff’s Amended Motion to Remand and to Plaintiff’s Limited Objection (Dkt. #28), Defendant Sean Roberts’ Objections to the Proposed Findngs and Recommendations (Dkt. #30), Plaintiff’s Reply to Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Amended Motion to Remand and to Defendant’s Objections (Dkt. #31), and Defendant Sean Roberts’ Motion to Sustain Removal Based Upon Plaintiff’s Affirmative Conduct Within the Federal Forum Following Removal (Dkt. #32), is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the objections are without merit. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. Page 1 of 2 . It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b) for Lack of Jurisdiction, or Failure to State a Claim and to Remand Case to State Court (Dkt. #13) is GRANTED and the case is REMANDED to the Justice of the Peace Court, Precinct 1, Cooke County, Texas. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 12th day of July, 2011. ____________________________________ MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?