Barfield v. Plano Housing Authority et al

Filing 93

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 56 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Helen Macey, Plano Housing Authority, Wendy Abel, Brenda McDonald, 62 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Joseph Barfield, 83 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 8/1/12. (cm, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION JOSEPH BARFIELD Plaintiff, § § § § § § § § § § § § § V. PLANO HOUSING AUTHORITY; HELEN MACEY, in her official capacity as Executive Director; BRENDA McDONALD in her official capacity as Director of Resident & Real Estate Services; and WENDY ABEL, in her official capacity as Compliance/Hearing Officer, Defendants. CASE NO. 4-11-cv-00206 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On July 6, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants’ Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 56) be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 62) be DENIED. The court has made a de novo review of the objections raised by Plaintiff and is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the objections are without merit as to the ultimate findings of the Magistrate Judge. The court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this court. 1 Therefore, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 62) is DENIED in its entirety. Defendants’ Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 56) is GRANTED for Defendants as to the following of Plaintiff’s claims: (G) Violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1437f and 24 C.F.R. § 982.202(d) Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (denial of voucher or other assistance to victim of domestic violence); (H) Violation of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seq.; (I) Violation of the Federal Fair Housing Amendments Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601, et seq.; and (B) Violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1437d(k) and 24 C.F.R. § 5.903(f), Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (accessing criminal records without consent). Defendants’ Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 56) is also GRANTED as to the claims against the individual defendants, and Plaintiff shall take nothing by his claims against Defendants Macey, McDonald and Abel in their official capacities. Defendants’ Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 56) is DENIED as to Defendant’s claim that some of Plaintiff’s allegations are barred by the statute of limitations, and that matter — in particular when any claims accrued — is reserved for trial. Defendants’ Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 56) is also DENIED as to the following of Plaintiff’s claims: (A) Violation of Plaintiff’s Due Process Rights Under the Fourteenth Amendment Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983; (B). Violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1437d(k) and 24 C.F.R. § 5.903(f), Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (accessing criminal records without opportunity to dispute); (C) Violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1437d(k) and 24 C.F.R. § 982.552(c)(2), Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (failing to consider Plaintiff’s and his children’s disabilities); (D) Violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1437d(k) and 24 C.F.R. § 982.553(a)(2)(ii), Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (denial of voucher or other housing assistance for 2 impermissible reason); (E) Violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1437d(k) and 24 C.F.R. § 982.554(a) Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (failing to inform Plaintiff of right of review of notice of noneligibility); and (F) Violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1437d(k) and 24 C.F.R. § 982.554(b) Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (failing to afford Plaintiff review of denial). Defendant’s counterclaims shall also proceed to trial. IT IS SO ORDERED. . SIGNED this the 1st day of August, 2012. _______________________________ RICHARD A. SCHELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?