Morrison et al v. Fettig et al

Filing 24

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 19 Report and Recommendations, GRANTING 7 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief filed by James Morrison, CM Capital, LP. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 10/12/2011. (baf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF James Morrison and CM Capital, LP Regarding an for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:11-cv-00411 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On September 7, 2011, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Complainants’ Pro Forma Motion Regarding Complaint for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability (Dkt. 7) be GRANTED. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the court. Therefore, Complainants’ Pro Forma Motion Regarding Complaint for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability (Dkt. 7) is GRANTED, and, there being no objection, the court will issue an order regarding the Complaint for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability, containing the terms proposed by Complainants (see Dkt. 22). IT IS SO ORDERED. . SIGNED this the 12th day of October, 2011. _______________________________ RICHARD A. SCHELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?