Roubinek v. Recontrust Company, N.A. et al
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 16 Motion to Strike, 13 Motion to Remand,. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 3/30/2012. (pad, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
JAMIE PIERCE ROUBINEK
Plaintiff,
VS.
RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A. and
BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P.
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Case No. 4:11cv416
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this
matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636. On September 19, 2011, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (Dkt. 13) and Plaintiff’s
Objection and Motion to Strike Defendants’ Supplement to Notice of Removal (Dkt. 16) be
DENIED.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions
of the court. Therefore, Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (Dkt. 13) and Plaintiff’s Objection and Motion
1
to Strike Defendants’ Supplement to Notice of Removal (Dkt. 16) are DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
.
SIGNED this the 30th day of March, 2012.
_______________________________
RICHARD A. SCHELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?