Roubinek v. Recontrust Company, N.A. et al
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE for 55 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiffs claims in this cause are dismissed without prejudice for want ofprosecution. This matter shall be closed on the courts docket, and all costs shall be borne by the party incurring same. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 9/2/13. (cm, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
JAMIE PIERCE ROUBINEK
Plaintiff,
VS.
RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A. and
BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P.
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Case No. 4:11cv416
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this
matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636. On May 24, 2013, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff’s claims should be dismissed without prejudice
for want of prosecution.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions
of the court. Therefore, Plaintiff’s claims in this cause are dismissed without prejudice for want of
prosecution. This matter shall be closed on the court’s docket, and all costs shall be borne by the
party incurring same.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
.
SIGNED this the 2nd day of September, 2013.
_______________________________
RICHARD A. SCHELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?