Roubinek v. Recontrust Company, N.A. et al

Filing 56

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE for 55 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiffs claims in this cause are dismissed without prejudice for want ofprosecution. This matter shall be closed on the courts docket, and all costs shall be borne by the party incurring same. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 9/2/13. (cm, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION JAMIE PIERCE ROUBINEK Plaintiff, VS. RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A. and BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P. Defendants. § § § § § § § § Case No. 4:11cv416 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On May 24, 2013, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff’s claims should be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the court. Therefore, Plaintiff’s claims in this cause are dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution. This matter shall be closed on the court’s docket, and all costs shall be borne by the party incurring same. IT IS SO ORDERED. . SIGNED this the 2nd day of September, 2013. _______________________________ RICHARD A. SCHELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?