Malikyar v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc et al
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE GRANTING 9 Motion to Dismiss, filed by BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engel, Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, Blue Star Financial Inc, 13 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 11/18/2011. (baf, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERM AN DIVISION
ALISE MALIKYAR
V.
BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP
ET AL.
§
§
§
§
§
§
CASE NO. 4:11-CV-417
Judge Schneider/ Judge Mazzant
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this
matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636. On October 28, 2011, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #9) be granted.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions
of the Court.
.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #9) is GRANTED.
Furthermore, since there is no basis for Plaintiff to sue Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engel and
Blue Star Financial, Inc., these Defendants are hereby DISMISSED.
It is accordingly ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
It is SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 18th day of November, 2011.
____________________________________
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?