VanHauen v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.

Filing 41

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 28 Motion to Dismiss, 39 Motion to Vacate. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 3/14/2012. (pad, )

Download PDF
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERM AN DIVISION KAY VANHAUEN v. AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC. § § § § § § § § Case No. 4:11-CV-461 Judge Schneider/Judge Mazzant MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On February 17, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 28) be granted. The Court, having made a de novo review of Plaintiff’s response to the motion to dismiss (Dk. No. 38, filed after entry of the Report and Recommendation), Plaintiff’s objections (Motion for Relief from Report and Recommendation - Dkt. No. 39), and Defendant’s Response thereto (Dkt. No. 40), is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the objections are without merit. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Page 1 of 2 . Complaint (Dkt. No. 28) is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief from Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 39) is DENIED. It is SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 14th day of March, 2012. ____________________________________ MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?