Franklin et al v. PNC Bank National Association
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE GRANTING 36 Motion for Summary Judgment,, filed by PNC Bank National Association, 69 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 2/29/2013. (baf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JAMES FRANKLIN and wife,
PNC BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
d/b/a PNC MORTGAGE and FEDERAL
HOME LOAN MORTGAGE
Case No. 4:11CV572
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this
matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636. On May 1, 2013, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings
of fact and recommendations that Defendant PNC Bank and Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 36) be GRANTED in its entirety for Defendants,
that Plaintiffs take nothing by their claims, and that this matter be closed on the court’s docket.
The court has made a de novo review of the objections raised by Plaintiffs and is of the
opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the objections are
without merit as to the ultimate findings of the Magistrate Judge. The court hereby adopts the
findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this court.
Therefore, Defendant PNC Bank and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation’s Motion
for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 36) is GRANTED in its entirety for Defendants, Plaintiffs shall take
nothing by their claims, and this matter shall be closed on the court’s docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this the 29th day of May, 2013.
RICHARD A. SCHELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?