Duggan v. Hartford Life And Accident Insurance Company et al
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 23 Report and Recommendation denying 7 and 11 Motion to Dismiss filed by Hartford Life And Accident Insurance Company. Therefore, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (see Dkts. 7 & 11) is DENIED and this case shall proceed. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 9/28/2012. (kls, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
LYNNE DUGGAN
Plaintiff,
VS.
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT
INSURANCE CO., EMERSON
ELECTRIC CO., EMERSON ELECTRIC
CO. LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN and
EMERSON PROCESS MANAGEMENT
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Case No. 4:11cv605
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this
matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636. On June 4, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings
of fact and recommendation that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (see Dkts. 7 & 11) be DENIED
and that this case proceed.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions
of the court. Therefore, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (see Dkts. 7 & 11) is DENIED and this case
shall proceed
IT IS SO ORDERED.
.
SIGNED this the 28th day of September, 2012.
_______________________________
RICHARD A. SCHELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?