Lackey v. Reliance Mortgage Company, Inc. et al

Filing 9

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 6 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Federal National Mortgage Association, Bank of America, N. A., 8 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 11/18/11. (cm, )

Download PDF
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERM AN DIVISION ALICE MARIE LACKEY V. RELIANCE MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC., ET AL. § § § § § § CASE NO. 4:11-CV-620 Judge Schneider/Judge Mazzant MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On October 28, 2011, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants Federal National Mortgage Association (improperly sued as Federal National Mortgage Association a/k/a Fannie Mae) and Bank of America, N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #6) be granted. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendants Federal National Mortgage Association (improperly sued as Federal National Mortgage Association a/k/a Fannie Mae) and Bank of America, N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #6) is GRANTED and all claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. Page 1 of 2 It is further ORDERED that Everett L. Anschutz and Reliance Mortgage Company, Inc. are DISMISSED without prejudice. It is SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 18th day of November, 2011. ____________________________________ MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?