Barea v. University of North Texas Police Department et al

Filing 30

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 27 Report and Recommendation; granting 18 Motion to Dismiss filed by Denton County Sheriff's Department; granting 19 Motion to Dismiss filed by Alexan der Gaston, University Of North Texas, Ed Reynolds, University of North Texas Police Department, 26 Report and Recommendation. Therefore, the UNT Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 19) and Defendant Denton County Sheriff's Department� 39;s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 18) are GRANTED, and the claims against Defendants the University of North Texas Police Department, the University of North Texas, Ed Reynolds, Alexander Gaston, and the Denton County Sheriff's Department are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 3/20/2013. (kls, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
JEFFREY SCOTT BAREA

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Plaintiff,
v.

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS
POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL.
Defendants.

CASE NO. 4:11CV634

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORTS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the reports of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636. On December 6, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing
proposed findings of fact and recommendations that the UNT Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt.
19) be GRANTED and that the claims against Defendants the University of North Texas Police
Department, the University of North Texas, Ed Reynolds, and Alexander Gaston should be dismissed
with prejudice (see Dkt. 26). Also on December 6, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was
entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Denton County
Sheriff’s Department’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 18) be GRANTED and that the claims against
Defendant Denton County Sheriff’s Department should be dismissed with prejudice (see Dkt. 27).

1

Having received the reports of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s reports as the findings and
conclusions of the court.
Therefore, the UNT Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 19) and Defendant Denton County
Sheriff’s Department’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 18) are GRANTED, and the claims against
Defendants the University of North Texas Police Department, the University of North Texas, Ed
Reynolds, Alexander Gaston, and the Denton County Sheriff’s Department are hereby dismissed
with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
.

SIGNED this the 20th day of March, 2013.

_______________________________
RICHARD A. SCHELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2