Carter v. JP Morgan Chase, NA
Filing
9
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 7 Motion to Dismiss filed by JP Morgan Chase, NA, 8 Report and Recommendations,. Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.s, incorrectly sued as JP Morgan Chase, NA Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #7) is GRANTED and all claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 1/5/12. (cm, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERM AN DIVISION
LOLAN CARTER
V.
JPMORGAN CHASE, NA
§
§
§
§
§
CASE NO. 4:11-CV-645
Judge Schneider/Judge Mazzant
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this
matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636. On December 14, 2011, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s, incorrectly
sued as “JP Morgan Chase, NA” Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #7) be granted.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions
.
of the Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s, incorrectly sued
as “JP Morgan Chase, NA” Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #7) is GRANTED and all claims are
DISMISSED with prejudice.
It is SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 5th day of January, 2012.
____________________________________
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?