Willard et al v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Trustee

Filing 12

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 8 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Bank of America, N.A., 11 Report and Recommendations. Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #8) is GRANTED and Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 3/14/12. (cm, )

Download PDF
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERM AN DIVISION JAMES EDWARD WILLARD, JR and PATRICIA WILLARD § § § V. § § DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST § COMPANY, TRUSTEE, ON BEHALF § OF THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF § MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL § INC. TRUST 2004-NC2, MORTGAGE § PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATE § SERIES 2004-NC2, BANK OF § AMERICA, N.A, AS SUCCESSOR BY § MERGER TO BAC HOME LOANS § SERVICING, L.P § CASE NO. 4:11-CV-844 Judge Schneider/Judge Mazzant MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On February 21, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #8) be granted. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #8) is GRANTED and Page 1 of 2 Plaintiffs’ claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. It is SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 14th day of March, 2012. ____________________________________ MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?