Shanghai Sunwin Industry Co., Ltd. v. Russell-Newman, Inc.

Filing 16

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 15 Report and Recommendations, GRANTING 13 Motion for Default Judgment, filed by Shanghai Sunwin Industry Co., Ltd.. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 9/12/2012. (baf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION SHANGHAI SUNWIN INDUSTRY CO., LTD., Plaintiff, v. RUSSELL-NEWMAN, INC., Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § Case No. 4:12cv42 (Judge Clark/Judge Mazzant) ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On July 16, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that the Motion for Default Judgment Against RussellNewman, Inc. [Doc. #13] be granted. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Motion for Default Judgment Against Russell-Newman, Inc. [Doc. #13] is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that: 1. Default Judgment in the amount of $3,818,586.48 is entered against Defendant Russell-Newman, Inc.; and 1 2. The Judgment amount shall accrue post-judgment interest at the rate of 0.17 percent per annum. All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 12 day of September, 2012. ___________________________________ Ron Clark, United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?