Bacon v. U.S. Bank National Association

Filing 17

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 5 Motion to Dismiss filed by Bank of America, N.A., U.S. Bank National Association, 14 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 9/28/12. (cm, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION BRUCE BACON § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § Plaintiff, VS. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Successor Trustee for the Holders of MERRILL LYNCH MORTGAGE INVESTERS TRUST, MORTGAGE LOAN ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-FFI, and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. Defendants. Case No. 4:12cv86 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On August 31, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. 5) be GRANTED as to any claims of wrongful foreclosure or the equitable request for the production of the original loan documents, as well as Plaintiff’s claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation, unfair debt collection, and violation of the Making Home Affordable (“MHA”), Home Affordable Modification Program (“HAMP”), and the Financial Institutions 1 Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (“FIRREA”) and DENIED as to Plaintiff’s request for declaratory judgment and claims of money had and received, common law fraud, fraud by nondisclosure and violation of Section 12.002 of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the court. Therefore, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. 5) is GRANTED as to any claims of wrongful foreclosure or the equitable request for the production of the original loan documents, as well as Plaintiff’s claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation, unfair debt collection, and violation of the Making Home Affordable (“MHA”), Home Affordable Modification Program (“HAMP”), and the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (“FIRREA”) and DENIED as to Plaintiff’s request for declaratory judgment and claims of money had and received, common law fraud, fraud by non-disclosure and violation of Section 12.002 of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code. IT IS SO ORDERED. . SIGNED this the 28th day of September, 2012. _______________________________ RICHARD A. SCHELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?