Kowalski et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 28

MEMORANDUN ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS denying 21 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 9/14/2012. (pad, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION ERIC KOWALSKI and ANTOINETTE KOWALSKI, Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § Case No. 4:12cv142 (Judge Clark/Judge Mazzant) MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On August 22, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint [Doc. #21] be denied. The Court, having made a de novo review of the objections raised by Defendant [Doc. #26], is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the objections are without merit. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint [Doc. #21] is DENIED. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 14 day of September, 2012. ___________________________________ Ron Clark, United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?