Rich et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 24 Report and Recommendations, 23 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #23] isgranted and that plaintiffs take nothing as a result of their claims against defendant. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 1/30/13. (cm, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
THOMAS JASON RICH and
BROOKE RICH,
Plaintiffs,
V.
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CASE NO. 4:12cv180
Judge Clark/Judge Mazzant
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this
matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636. On December 14, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #23]
be granted.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions
of the court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #23] is
granted and that plaintiffs take nothing as a result of their claims against defendant. This case is
DISMISSED with prejudice.
1
All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED.
The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action.
So ORDERED and SIGNED on January 30 2013.
____,
_________________________________________
Ron Clark
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?