Hilger et al v. Bank of America, N.A.

Filing 16

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 14 Report and Recommendations, 5 Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, filed by Bank of America, N.A.. Defendant Bank of America, N.A.s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Original Petition Under Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt. 5) is GRANTED and Plaintiffs claims are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 3/27/13. (cm, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION MARK HILGER and JANET HILGER Plaintiffs, VS. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. Defendant. § § § § § § § § § Case No. 4:12cv214 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On February 25, 2013, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Bank of America, N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Original Petition Under Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt. 5) be GRANTED and that Plaintiffs’ claims be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the court. Therefore, Defendant Bank of America, N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Original Petition Under Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt. 5) is GRANTED and Plaintiffs’ claims are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim. IT IS SO ORDERED. . SIGNED this the 27th day of March, 2013. _______________________________ RICHARD A. SCHELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?