Rivera v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC

Filing 16

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 13 Order, Report and Recommendations, 5 Motion to Dismiss filed by Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC. Plaintiffs claims against Defendant are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 3/27/13. (cm, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION JORGE RIVERA, § § § § § § § § § Plaintiff, VS. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Defendant. Case No. 4:12CV256 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S AFFIRMATIVE CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On October 19, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendation that Defendant Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt. 5) be GRANTED and that Plaintiff’s claims be dismissed with prejudice. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the court. Therefore, Defendant Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to 1 Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt. 5) is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant are dismissed with prejudice. Defendant’s counterclaim against Plaintiff remains until further order of the court. IT IS SO ORDERED. . SIGNED this the 27th day of March, 2013. _______________________________ RICHARD A. SCHELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?