United States of America v. $5,900.00 in United States currency

Filing 14

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE - GRANTING 11 Motion for Default Judgment filed by United States of America, 13 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 7/3/2013. (baf, )

Download PDF
**NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § § $5,900.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, § § Defendant. § Case No. 4:12-CV-281 (Judge Clark/Judge Mazzant) ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On April 26, 2013, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment [Doc. #11] be granted [Doc. #13]. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment [Doc. #11] is GRANTED, and a judgment of forfeiture is entered in favor of the United States and that all right, title, and interest in the defendant property is vested in the United States. The defendant property shall be disposed of according to law. All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED. 1   The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 3 day of July, 2013. ___________________________________ Ron Clark, United States District Judge 2  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?