Gardner et al v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation et al
Filing
8
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 6 Report and Recommendation. ORDERED that plaintiffs' case is dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuantto Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 10/19/2012. (kls, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
FREDDIE GARDNER and
GLODEAN GARDNER,
Plaintiffs,
V.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE
CORPORATION and WELLS FARGO
HOME MORTGAGE,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CASE NO. 4:12cv359
Judge Clark/Judge Mazzant
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this
matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636. On September 20, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that plaintiffs’ case be dismissed for failure to prosecute
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions
of the court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that plaintiffs’ case is dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
1
All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED.
The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 19 day of October, 2012.
___________________________________
Ron Clark, United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?