Stallings et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al

Filing 65

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE - GRANTING 29 Motion for Summary Judgment,, filed by CitiMortgage, Inc., Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., 61 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 3/28/2014. (baf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION JACKSON STALLINGS and SHEILA STALLINGS, Plaintiffs, VS. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP., and UNKNOWN PARTIES, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § Case No. 4:12-cv-00632 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On February 7, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 29) be GRANTED for Defendants, that Plaintiffs take nothing by any of their remaining claims here, and that the matter be closed on the court’s docket. The court has made a de novo review of the objections raised by Plaintiffs, as well as Defendants’ response and is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the objections are without merit as to the ultimate findings of the Magistrate Judge. The court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this court. 1 Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 29) is GRANTED for Defendants, and Plaintiffs shall take nothing by any of their remaining claims here. IT IS SO ORDERED. . SIGNED this the 28th day of March, 2014. _______________________________ RICHARD A. SCHELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?